Discrepancies in Australian jurisdiction-based regulation of invasive plants
State-by-state invasive plant regulation in Australia creates inconsistent protections that undermine national biosecurity efforts.
By Jacob Maher, John Virtue, Oliver C. Stringham, Phillip Cassey in Research
October 29, 2024
Abstract
In Australia, regulation of invasive plant species is largely devolved to individual states and territories, resulting in a patchwork of differing prohibited-species lists and enforcement standards. We assess the scale of these jurisdictional discrepancies and show how a species that is legally prohibited from sale or possession in one jurisdiction may remain unregulated and freely traded in another. This inconsistency undermines national efforts to prevent invasive plant spread and highlights the need for greater harmonization across Australian jurisdictions.
- Posted on:
- October 29, 2024
- Length:
- 1 minute read, 79 words
- Categories:
- Research
- See Also:
- Horizon scan of online plant trade reveals emerging invasive species and high-risk platforms
- Identifying recent captive escapees of Rainbow Lorikeets (Trichoglossus moluccanus) at different stages of the pet-release pathway
- The pet trade of native species outside of their natural distributions within Australia is a biosecurity risk